The Kafkaesque trial against an official of the al-Aqsa Foundation in Malmö, Sweden, is set to begin on Monday February 2. The al-Aqsa Foundation official, a Swedish citizen of Palestinian origin, is accused of 'supporting terrorism'. According to his own account he has only managed donations for humanitarian purposes, stating that 13 000 USD has been sent for pediatric care and other charitable purposes.
The prosecutor, Agnetha Hilding Qvarnström, does not challenge the claim that the money has been used for charitable purposes, but states that "to put money into that system, regardless of what purpose, is indirectly to support terror" ("Att peta in pengar någonstans i det här systemet, oavsett var, är att indirekt stödja terror.") Her logic is quite stark, namely that any financial transanction into the Gaza strip indirectly supports terrorism. That is, essentially, collective guilt elevated as a general legal standard.
In the legal case, the prosecution is expected to rely heavily on materials fabricated by the Israeli intelligence services. The entire court case is a tragic charade, from its very onset.
News links: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
𝐀𝐈 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰 𝐨𝐟 “𝐃𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐩𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐩𝐭
𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐢𝐧 𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐱’𝐬
𝐖𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬, 𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡 𝟏𝟖𝟒𝟑 𝐭𝐨 𝐀𝐮𝐠𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝟏𝟖𝟒𝟒”
-
Nasir Khan’s work on Marx’s theory of alienation presents a meticulous
analysis of this critical period in Marx’s early thought. By narrowing the
focus to...
13 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment