Well, this is almost over-debated by now, but I'd just have to state that I think the BBC's reasoning on not broadcasting an appeal for humanitarian aid for Gaza is way to bizarre to comprehend. Stating that Gaza is an 'ongoing news story', and thus Gazans don't deserve basic anemities shows a stark lack of sensitivity to human needs.
Bringing up the 'suffering and distress of civilians and combatants on both sides of the conflict' is nonsense in this context. Don't the 10s of Israeli victims of the current conflict have access to food, medicine and housing at present?
And when BBC did run Darfur or Congo DEC appeals, were those conflicts not ongoing news stories? Did the BBC not bother to be 'impartial' then?
News links: Sydsvenskan, Politiken
𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐂𝐄𝐅 𝐒𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐈𝐬𝐫𝐚𝐞𝐥 𝐇𝐚𝐬 𝐊𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐎𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝟏𝟑,𝟎𝟎𝟎
𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐧 𝐢𝐧 𝐆𝐚𝐳𝐚
-
The agency says many are suffering from malnutrition and do not ‘even have
the energy to cry’ by Dave DeCamp, Antiwar. com, March 17, 2024 The UN’s
child r...
18 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment